Impoliteness Strategies Inflicted by Twitter Users: The Case of Interaction with Malaysian Royal Family


  • Nidana Binti Yahya
  • Zuraifah Binti Zaini



CMC, impoliteness theory, royalties, social media, Twitter


The language used in Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) has been a debated issue for a long time. Ever since the normalisation of this method of communication, the interaction has been going on only between the common people, resulting in a more expressive and direct communication process. However, recently, the elites and royalties have also come into CMC platforms which causes confusion in the interaction between the common people and the royalties. Therefore, it leads to the clash between the common people and the royalties on social media. This study aims to analyse the impoliteness strategies used by Twitter users in expressing their resentment towards royalties by using the impoliteness theory introduced by Culpeper in 1996. 442 tweets that represent impoliteness has been gathered through purposive sampling method. Based on the analysis, the most popular strategy used by Twitter users is off-record (75), followed by sarcasm (55), Negative Impoliteness (41), Bald on record (39) and positive impoliteness (32). The findings show that although Twitter users are more expressive, they tend to resort to a more subtle approach to express their resentment towards the royalties.


Amalia, I., & Prasetyorini, K. A. (2018, July). Politeness System Portrayed in Social Media: A Case Study of Facebook Account “Sapawarga Kota Surabaya”. In International Conference on Language Phenomena in Multimodal Communication (KLUA 2018) (pp. 244-250).

Balan, Sergiu. 2010. M. Foucault’s view on Power Relations. Cogito. Multidisciplinary Research Journal. II. 55-61.

Bernstein, A., Marshall, E. C., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2011). Multi-method evaluation of distress tolerance measures and construct (s): Concurrent relations to mood and anxiety psychopathology and quality of life. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2(3), 386-399.

Baoqin, W., Afzaal, M., Younas, M., & Noor, U. (2020). Impoliteness Strategies and Rapport-Challenge Pragmatic Orientation in Competing Utterance. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29(3), 606.

R. Buettner and K. Buettner, "A Systematic Literature Review of Twitter Research from a Socio-Political Revolution Perspective. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2016. pp. 2206-2215. https://doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.277.

Culpeper, J. (2016). Impoliteness strategies. Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society, 421-445. Springer.

Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Elliott, T. (2017). Youth, activism, and social movements. Sociology Compass, 11(4).

Erza, S., & Hamzah, H. (2018). Impoliteness used by haters on Instagram comments of male-female entertainers. English Language and Literature, 7(1).

Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New Yok: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. 2002. Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Volume 3). Penguin Books

Ghani, N. A. B. A. A. Online Animosity: Impoliteness Strategies and Triggers of Hostility in a Social Networking Site in Brunei.

Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782-799.

Khalis, Hamdi & Mohd. Khalib, Farahnaz & Yahya, Nidana. (2020). Emotive Language in Online News: The Case of Awani News Channel. e-Jurnal Bahasa dan Linguistik (e-JBL). 2.

Maros, M., & Rosli, L. (2017). Politeness strategies in Twitter updates of female English language studies Malaysian undergraduates. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 23(1).

Ningsih, T. W. (2018). Impoliteness Realised By Social Media Users In Celebrities’ Instagram (Master’s Thesis, University Of Muhammadiyah Sumatra Utara Medan).

Osman, W. R. H. M., & Shin, C. (2019). Fenomena Evolusi Dan Revolusi Makna Perkataan Melayu: Tinjauan Awal (Evolutionary And Revolutionary Word Change (Phenomena) In Malay: A Preliminary Study). Asian Journal Of Environment, History And Heritage, 3(2).

Redmond, M. V. (2015). Face and politeness theories. English Technical Reports and White Papers. 2.

Salman, A., Mustaffa, N., Salleh, M. A. M., & Ali, M. N. S. (2016). Social media and agenda setting: Implications on political agenda. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1).

Wagner, L. (2008). Positive-and Negative-Politeness Strategies : Apologising in the Speech Community of Cuernavaca , Mexico.

Winichakul, T. (2016). Thailand’s hyper-royalism: Its past success and present predicament. Trend in Southeast Asia.

Zhang, K., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2014, May). Anonymity in social media: Effects of content controversiality and social endorsement on sharing behavior. Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska press.




How to Cite

Bin Kadri, H. K., Binti Mohamed, R., Binti Shafie, S. F., Binti Yahya, N., & Binti Zaini, Z. (2021). Impoliteness Strategies Inflicted by Twitter Users: The Case of Interaction with Malaysian Royal Family. E-Jurnal Bahasa Dan Linguistik (e-JBL), 3(2), 94-103.